PENGARUH PENGGUNAAN AI GENERATIF SEBAGAI ASISTEN BELAJAR TERHADAP LITERASI DIGITAL KRITIS MAHASISWA TEKNIK INFORMATIKA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46306/jion.v2i2.312Keywords:
generative artificial intelligence, learning assistant, critical digital literacy, Informatics Engineering students, technology-enhanced learningAbstract
The rapid development of generative artificial intelligence (AI) has significantly transformed learning practices in higher education, particularly through its use as a learning assistant for Informatics Engineering students. However, the use of generative AI without adequate critical digital literacy may lead to overreliance and unreflective technology use. This study aims to examine the effect of using generative AI as a learning assistant on the critical digital literacy of Informatics Engineering students. The research employed a quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental design using a one-group pretest–posttest model. The research participants were Informatics Engineering students at Universitas Esa Unggul. Data were collected using a critical digital literacy questionnaire measuring information evaluation skills, reflection on AI-generated outputs, digital ethics awareness, and informed decision-making. Data analysis was conducted using descriptive statistics and a paired sample t-test. The results revealed a substantial improvement in students’ critical digital literacy, with the mean score increasing from 56.50 in the pre-intervention phase to 81.00 in the post-intervention phase. These findings indicate that the use of generative AI as a learning assistant has a positive effect on students’ critical digital literacy. The study highlights the importance of pedagogically structured integration of generative AI in higher education to strengthen students’ critical thinking and responsible digital technology use in the era of artificial intelligence
Downloads
References
Alammary, A., Sheard, J., & Carbone, A. (2019). Blended learning in higher education: Three different design approaches. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(3), 1–17.
https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4421
Hew, K. F., Lo, C. K., Flipped Classroom Research Group, & Kwan, C. L. (2020). Strategies for designing effective active learning in higher education using blended learning approaches. Educational Technology & Society, 23(2), 1–15.
Kasneci, E., et al. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Koltay, T. (2016). The media and the literacies: Media literacy, information literacy, digital literacy. Media, Culture & Society, 33(2), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443710393382
Ng, W. (2016). Defining digital literacy for learners in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 21(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9434-0
Schindler, L. A., Burkholder, G. J., Morad, O. A., & Marsh, C. (2017). Computers in education: A meta-analysis of student engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(25), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0076-0
UNESCO. (2021). AI and education: Guidance for policy-makers. UNESCO Publishing.
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(39), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Azifa Habiba, Ranny Meilisa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






