MAFIA BERKELEY KELOMPOK NASIONALIS NEOLIBERAL DALAM DINAMIKA KEBIJAKAN EKONOMI INDONESIA MASA ORDE BARU
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46306/jppsg.v2i2.293Keywords:
Berkeley Mafia, New Order, Soeharto, Nationalist-NeoliberalAbstract
This study examines the Berkeley Mafia phenomenon as a nationalist-neoliberal group that had a significant influence on the dynamics of Indonesian economic policy during the New Order era. The main problem lies in the dominance of technocrats graduated from the University of California, Berkeley, in the formulation of economic policies oriented towards stabilization and liberalization, thus giving rise to debates regarding economic sovereignty and dependence on international institutions. The theoretical framework used includes elite theory, developmental state theory, and the neoliberal approach to public policy. The research method uses a library study with a historical-political analysis of documents, archives, and academic literature related to New Order economic policies. The results show that the Berkeley Mafia played a significant role in formulating macroeconomic policies that emphasized fiscal stability, deregulation, and global economic integration. Their success in controlling inflation and attracting foreign investment is recognized, but these policies are also considered to have reinforced structural inequality and economic dependency. In conclusion, the influence of the Berkeley Mafia reflects the tension between the interests of economic nationalism and the neoliberal agenda, which formed a crucial foundation for the direction of Indonesia's economic development during the New Order era and a policy legacy that is still felt today
Downloads
References
Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia. (2016). Arsip Nasional RI | Guide Arsip Perjuangan Pembebasan Irian Barat 1949-1969. https://anri.go.id/download/guide-arsip-perjuanganpembebasan- irian-barat-19491969-1600672140
Baswir, R. (2006). Mafia Berkeley dan Krisis Ekonomi Indonesia. Yogyakarta Pustaka Pelajar. Baswir, R. (2015). Ekonomi kerakyatan vs. neoliberalisme. Gema Keadilan, 2(1), 8-17.
Bawazier, F. (2017). Sistem Ekonomi Pancasila: Memaknai Pasal 33 UUD 1945. Jurnal Keamanan Nasional, 3(2), 233-252.
Bresnan, John. (2006). At Home Abroad: A Memoir of the Ford Foundation in Indonesia, 1953- 1973. Jakarta: Equinox Pub.
Boediono (2009), Ekonomi Indonesia, Mau Kemana: kumpulan Essai, jakarta : Kompas.
Fikri, A., & Hasudungan, A. N. (2021). Nasionalisasi-Investasi Perusahaan Asing, Mafia Berkeley dan Berakhirnya Rezim Presiden Soekarno. Yupa: Historical Studies Journal, 5(2), 46-60.
Hasudungan, A. N. (2020). TNI-AD dan Kesatuan Aksi Mahasiswa Indonesia (KAMI) dalam Kelengseran Soekarno Tahun 1965-1968. Yupa: Historical Studies Journal, 3(1), 28–37.
Islamisasi Pembangunan. (2014). (n.p.): UMSU Press.
Latief, H. (2013). Kumpulan Tulisan Heri Latief. Indonesia: Indie Book Corner.
Mack, A. (2001). Rethinking the Dynamics of Capital Accumulation in Colonial and Post-Colonial Indonesia: Production Regulation. University of Sydney.
Majalah Tempo. (1971). Dari Kisah The Berkeley Mafia. Majalah Tempo.
Masud, D. A., & Mulyadi, E. (2008). Rizal Ramli Lokomotif Perubahan:langkah Strategis Dan Kebijakan Terobosan Untuk Indonesia Yang Lebih Baik. Cipta Citra Persada.
Mubyarto, Sistem dan Moral Ekonomi Indonesia (Jakarta: LP3ES, 1988); juga bisa dibaca pada tulisan Mubyarto, Ekonomi Pancasila (Yogyakarta: Aditya Media, 1997
Mustopadidjaja AR, dkk (2012), Bappenas dalam Sejarah Perencanaan Pembangunan indonesia, jakarta: LP3ES.
Pertiwi, D. K. (2021). Mengenal Orde Baru. Indonesia: Buku Mojok Group.
Purdey, J. (2016). Narratives to power. South East Asia Research,24(3), 369–385. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26372041
Rafick, I. (2008). Catatan hitam lima presiden Indonesia: sebuah investigasi 1997-2007, mafia ekonomi, dan jalan baru membangun Indonesia. Indonesia: Ufuk Publishing House.
Ransom, D. (2006). Mafia Berkeley dan pembunuhan masal di Indonesia. Koalisi Anti Utang (KAU). Ridwan, N. K. (2019). Masa depan NU. Indonesia: IRCiSoD.
Shin Yasui (2002), “How was the Market Economy Implanted in Developing Countries? The Cases of Chile and Indonesia
van Drie, J., & van Boxtel, C. (2008). Historical Reasoning: Towards a Framework for Analyzing Students’ Reasoning about the Past. Educational Psychology Review, 20(2), 87–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9056-1
World Bank, ed. (1993). The East Asian Miracle: Economic Growth and Public Policy: Summary. A World Bank Policy Research Report. Washington, D.C: World Bank.
Zuhdi, S. (2018). Historiografi dan Metodologi Sejarah. BuletinAl-Turas, 2(2), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.15408/bat.v2i4.6872
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Athaullah Dzaky, Rizki Maharani, Naura Fadilah, Shella Levina Margareta, Chairunisa Depa Kartika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
